<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 394 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216586</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the suppression of gross receipts and inflation of advertisement expenses. The tribunal found the explanations provided lacked substantiation, considering them as attempts to reduce taxable income. The delay in remittance of TDS was also upheld, resulting in interest charges. The appeal was dismissed, and the additions made by the tax authorities were confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 394 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216586</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the suppression of gross receipts and inflation of advertisement expenses. The tribunal found the explanations provided lacked substantiation, considering them as attempts to reduce taxable income. The delay in remittance of TDS was also upheld, resulting in interest charges. The appeal was dismissed, and the additions made by the tax authorities were confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>