<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 362 - ITAT, CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty of Rs.1,16,000 levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the findings that the estimation made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Tribunal did not indicate any concealment of income, especially considering the agricultural nature of the income involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 362 - ITAT, CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty of Rs.1,16,000 levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the findings that the estimation made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Tribunal did not indicate any concealment of income, especially considering the agricultural nature of the income involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>