<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 358 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. It held that the disallowance under section 14A could not be sustained as there was no purchase of shares, making section 14A inapplicable. The Tribunal directed the AO to assess the overall funds availability in line with a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. It stressed the significance of evaluating commercial expediency in transactions and emphasized the necessity for thorough examination by revenue authorities in such instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 358 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. It held that the disallowance under section 14A could not be sustained as there was no purchase of shares, making section 14A inapplicable. The Tribunal directed the AO to assess the overall funds availability in line with a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. It stressed the significance of evaluating commercial expediency in transactions and emphasized the necessity for thorough examination by revenue authorities in such instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>