https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216535 The Tribunal dismissed the applications for condonation of delay, Stay Petitions, and appeals due to the appellant's failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for the 39-day delay in filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. Despite the appellant's claim of not receiving the Order-in-Appeal until later through an RTI application, the Tribunal found that the appellant's advocate was served with the relevant documents on the same date the appellant became aware of the order. The discrepancy in serving the order to a different unit did not justify the delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appellant's requests for condonation of delay and subsequent appeals. en-us Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216535 The Tribunal dismissed the applications for condonation of delay, Stay Petitions, and appeals due to the appellant's failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for the 39-day delay in filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. Despite the appellant's claim of not receiving the Order-in-Appeal until later through an RTI application, the Tribunal found that the appellant's advocate was served with the relevant documents on the same date the appellant became aware of the order. The discrepancy in serving the order to a different unit did not justify the delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appellant's requests for condonation of delay and subsequent appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216535