<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216517</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for all relevant assessment years. It was held that Explanation 5 does not apply to searches conducted before 01.06.2007 regarding entries in seized material. The decision emphasized adherence to legal provisions post the Finance Act, 2007, and consistency in judicial interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216517</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for all relevant assessment years. It was held that Explanation 5 does not apply to searches conducted before 01.06.2007 regarding entries in seized material. The decision emphasized adherence to legal provisions post the Finance Act, 2007, and consistency in judicial interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>