<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 299 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216491</link>
    <description>The court upheld the applicability of Section 35AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in a case involving a dispute over the deduction of an amount paid for acquiring know-how under Section 37. It clarified that once Section 35AB applies, Section 37 has no relevance. The court emphasized that the expenditure must be incurred &quot;for&quot; the business of the assessee, aligning with the requirements of Section 35AB. The judgment highlighted the importance of expenditure being for business purposes and dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the decision of the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 299 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216491</link>
      <description>The court upheld the applicability of Section 35AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in a case involving a dispute over the deduction of an amount paid for acquiring know-how under Section 37. It clarified that once Section 35AB applies, Section 37 has no relevance. The court emphasized that the expenditure must be incurred &quot;for&quot; the business of the assessee, aligning with the requirements of Section 35AB. The judgment highlighted the importance of expenditure being for business purposes and dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the decision of the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>