<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 279 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216471</link>
    <description>The government upheld the classification of goods as female screws under Custom Tariff Heading (CTH) 7415 instead of under CTH 8302 as Brass Anchors. The penalties imposed on the applicant, including confiscation of goods, fine, and penalty, were set aside as there was no finding of intentional mala fide or violation. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proving intentional wrongdoing for imposing penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 279 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216471</link>
      <description>The government upheld the classification of goods as female screws under Custom Tariff Heading (CTH) 7415 instead of under CTH 8302 as Brass Anchors. The penalties imposed on the applicant, including confiscation of goods, fine, and penalty, were set aside as there was no finding of intentional mala fide or violation. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proving intentional wrongdoing for imposing penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>