<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 277 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216469</link>
    <description>The petition for winding up of the respondent company under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, was dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties. The respondent company, after receiving a legal notice for outstanding payment, agreed to settle the dues and paid Rs. 6,50,000/- to the petitioner firm, which was accepted as full satisfaction of the claim. The payment and acceptance led to the resolution of the dispute, emphasizing the significance of amicable settlements in commercial matters and obviating the need for formal legal actions like winding up petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 277 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216469</link>
      <description>The petition for winding up of the respondent company under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, was dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties. The respondent company, after receiving a legal notice for outstanding payment, agreed to settle the dues and paid Rs. 6,50,000/- to the petitioner firm, which was accepted as full satisfaction of the claim. The payment and acceptance led to the resolution of the dispute, emphasizing the significance of amicable settlements in commercial matters and obviating the need for formal legal actions like winding up petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>