<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 275 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216467</link>
    <description>Fire bricks grog produced by breaking and grinding refractory bricks, and sold in loose condition, was held not to satisfy the shape requirement in Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Because the processed material no longer retained the requisite shape of refractory bricks, it could not be classified under Heading 6901.00 and was not excisable. The reasoning also noted that the adjudication had gone beyond the scope of the show-cause notice, reinforcing the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s classification claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 275 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216467</link>
      <description>Fire bricks grog produced by breaking and grinding refractory bricks, and sold in loose condition, was held not to satisfy the shape requirement in Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Because the processed material no longer retained the requisite shape of refractory bricks, it could not be classified under Heading 6901.00 and was not excisable. The reasoning also noted that the adjudication had gone beyond the scope of the show-cause notice, reinforcing the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s classification claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>