https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216463 The appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with statutory provisions, leading to the need for relief sought by the appellants. The case involved the classification of services under Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Service, with the appellants arguing a bona fide belief in their tax liability position. Stay applications were granted based on pre-deposit requirements, and directions were given for remand and compliance with the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration of the appeals on their merits. Compliance with the outlined directions was mandated for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216463 The appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with statutory provisions, leading to the need for relief sought by the appellants. The case involved the classification of services under Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Service, with the appellants arguing a bona fide belief in their tax liability position. Stay applications were granted based on pre-deposit requirements, and directions were given for remand and compliance with the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration of the appeals on their merits. Compliance with the outlined directions was mandated for further proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216463