<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216457</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in a case involving a private limited company&#039;s assessment of closing stock undervaluation for the Assessment Year 1987-88. The Court held that the addition of Rs. 16,39,000 to the assessee&#039;s income due to alleged undervaluation of closing stock was incorrect. The order of the CIT(A) upholding the assessee&#039;s position was affirmed, and the civil appeal filed by the department was dismissed without costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216457</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in a case involving a private limited company&#039;s assessment of closing stock undervaluation for the Assessment Year 1987-88. The Court held that the addition of Rs. 16,39,000 to the assessee&#039;s income due to alleged undervaluation of closing stock was incorrect. The order of the CIT(A) upholding the assessee&#039;s position was affirmed, and the civil appeal filed by the department was dismissed without costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>