<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 263 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216455</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court transferred various petitions challenging the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 to the Gujarat High Court to ensure consistency in decisions. The Gujarat High Court ruled that retrospective amendments should not harm assessees and quashed the amendment affecting certain assessees with high export turnover. The Bombay High Court, following the Gujarat High Court&#039;s decision, disposed of related petitions to maintain uniformity and clarity in interpreting the Income Tax Act, 1961 amendments, avoiding conflicting outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 263 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216455</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court transferred various petitions challenging the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 to the Gujarat High Court to ensure consistency in decisions. The Gujarat High Court ruled that retrospective amendments should not harm assessees and quashed the amendment affecting certain assessees with high export turnover. The Bombay High Court, following the Gujarat High Court&#039;s decision, disposed of related petitions to maintain uniformity and clarity in interpreting the Income Tax Act, 1961 amendments, avoiding conflicting outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>