<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 257 - ITAT, CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 2,55,53,890 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07, as the denial of the deduction under Section 80IA did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars, based on legitimate grounds and separate claim, as per legal precedents and Supreme Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 257 - ITAT, CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 2,55,53,890 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07, as the denial of the deduction under Section 80IA did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars, based on legitimate grounds and separate claim, as per legal precedents and Supreme Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>