<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 255 - ITAT, CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2008-09. It held that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were unjustified as the assessee had sufficient funds and had paid taxes on the amounts in question. The Tribunal found that the additions amounted to double taxation and directed that they be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 255 - ITAT, CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2008-09. It held that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were unjustified as the assessee had sufficient funds and had paid taxes on the amounts in question. The Tribunal found that the additions amounted to double taxation and directed that they be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>