https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216434 The court dismissed the appeal in a case involving the opportunity of hearing regarding undue hardship under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The court held that principles of natural justice do not always require a personal hearing and that the appellate authority had considered the appellant's undue hardship by directing a 20% deposit. The court found that no substantial question of law was involved, and the appeal was dismissed, with the possibility of the appeal being heard on merits if the pre-deposit amount is deposited within one month. en-us Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216434 The court dismissed the appeal in a case involving the opportunity of hearing regarding undue hardship under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The court held that principles of natural justice do not always require a personal hearing and that the appellate authority had considered the appellant's undue hardship by directing a 20% deposit. The court found that no substantial question of law was involved, and the appeal was dismissed, with the possibility of the appeal being heard on merits if the pre-deposit amount is deposited within one month. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216434