<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 240 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216432</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside duty and interest demands, reducing the penalty to Rs. 5,000, and overturning penalties on the Managing Director and Executive Director. The judgments of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal and the Bombay High Court played a crucial role in determining the correct application of duty payment methods and penalties in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 240 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216432</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside duty and interest demands, reducing the penalty to Rs. 5,000, and overturning penalties on the Managing Director and Executive Director. The judgments of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal and the Bombay High Court played a crucial role in determining the correct application of duty payment methods and penalties in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>