<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 229 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially upheld the additions made by the authorities, reducing the total addition from Rs.23,40,650 to Rs.2,50,000. The judgment emphasized the need for justifying additions with material evidence and maintaining balance in tax assessments, considering disclosures during the survey. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the assessment process and deemed some of the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions unjustified, leading to a reduced final addition amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 229 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially upheld the additions made by the authorities, reducing the total addition from Rs.23,40,650 to Rs.2,50,000. The judgment emphasized the need for justifying additions with material evidence and maintaining balance in tax assessments, considering disclosures during the survey. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the assessment process and deemed some of the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions unjustified, leading to a reduced final addition amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>