<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 226 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216418</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the classification of income from property activities for taxation purposes. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) classified the income as business income and income from other sources, respectively. The appellant argued for its treatment as income from house property. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing a precedent from the Calcutta High Court regarding income derived from property-related activities. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 226 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216418</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the classification of income from property activities for taxation purposes. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) classified the income as business income and income from other sources, respectively. The appellant argued for its treatment as income from house property. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing a precedent from the Calcutta High Court regarding income derived from property-related activities. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>