<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 209 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216401</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, remanded the appeal to the adjudicating authority with instructions for the appellant to confirm the sole claim against the invoice, prevent multiple claims, and indemnify the Revenue for any potential loss. The decision aimed to safeguard Revenue&#039;s interests by ensuring compliance with documentation requirements and fair utilization of Cenvat credit, ultimately disposing of both the stay application and the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 209 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216401</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, remanded the appeal to the adjudicating authority with instructions for the appellant to confirm the sole claim against the invoice, prevent multiple claims, and indemnify the Revenue for any potential loss. The decision aimed to safeguard Revenue&#039;s interests by ensuring compliance with documentation requirements and fair utilization of Cenvat credit, ultimately disposing of both the stay application and the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>