<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 194 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of an addition made on account of income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found that the amounts in question were adequately explained through legitimate transactions and supported by documentary evidence, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s claim. The decision to partially delete the addition was affirmed, emphasizing that the funds were not from undisclosed sources and were properly documented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 194 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of an addition made on account of income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found that the amounts in question were adequately explained through legitimate transactions and supported by documentary evidence, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s claim. The decision to partially delete the addition was affirmed, emphasizing that the funds were not from undisclosed sources and were properly documented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>