<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 191 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216383</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the deletion of additions for lorry hire charges and sundry creditors, emphasizing the need for proper explanation and proof of credits. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the net profit rate addition and various expenses, except for minor disallowances related to personal use. The Tribunal&#039;s decision provided clarity on the burden of proof for credits and the adequacy of evidence for expense deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 191 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216383</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the deletion of additions for lorry hire charges and sundry creditors, emphasizing the need for proper explanation and proof of credits. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the net profit rate addition and various expenses, except for minor disallowances related to personal use. The Tribunal&#039;s decision provided clarity on the burden of proof for credits and the adequacy of evidence for expense deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>