<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 177 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216369</link>
    <description>A modification of the stay order was not maintainable because no mistake apparent on record was shown in the earlier finding that no specific statutory provision had been identified as contravened; an alleged breach of a circular did not cure that defect. Penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act was unsustainable because the record did not establish removal of imported goods without written permission under Section 45(2)(b), nor any recorded violation of the Cargo Handling Regulations. In the absence of a clearly identified statutory breach, the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 177 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216369</link>
      <description>A modification of the stay order was not maintainable because no mistake apparent on record was shown in the earlier finding that no specific statutory provision had been identified as contravened; an alleged breach of a circular did not cure that defect. Penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act was unsustainable because the record did not establish removal of imported goods without written permission under Section 45(2)(b), nor any recorded violation of the Cargo Handling Regulations. In the absence of a clearly identified statutory breach, the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>