https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216368 The High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Despite conflicting judgments, the court followed precedent and ruled in favor of the respondent, citing the Ambica Industries case. The importance of maintaining consistency and clarity in legal interpretations, particularly in jurisdictional matters, was emphasized to prevent judicial anarchy and forum shopping. The appellant was advised to seek recourse in either the Supreme Court or the High Court of Kerala. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216368 The High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Despite conflicting judgments, the court followed precedent and ruled in favor of the respondent, citing the Ambica Industries case. The importance of maintaining consistency and clarity in legal interpretations, particularly in jurisdictional matters, was emphasized to prevent judicial anarchy and forum shopping. The appellant was advised to seek recourse in either the Supreme Court or the High Court of Kerala. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216368