<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 174 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order confirming a duty demand of Rs.1,97,698/- along with interest, which could be reduced to 25% if paid within 30 days. The appellant&#039;s Accountant&#039;s statement admitting to clearing goods without paying duty was deemed sufficient evidence, leading to the confirmation of the demand. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the lack of specific details in quantifying the duty, the Tribunal found the Accountant&#039;s statement credible and upheld the impugned order. The penalty was reduced to 25% due to the appellant&#039;s pre-Show Cause Notice duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 174 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order confirming a duty demand of Rs.1,97,698/- along with interest, which could be reduced to 25% if paid within 30 days. The appellant&#039;s Accountant&#039;s statement admitting to clearing goods without paying duty was deemed sufficient evidence, leading to the confirmation of the demand. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the lack of specific details in quantifying the duty, the Tribunal found the Accountant&#039;s statement credible and upheld the impugned order. The penalty was reduced to 25% due to the appellant&#039;s pre-Show Cause Notice duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>