<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 157 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216349</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reference to the Valuation Officer was invalid as it was not preceded by the rejection of the books of account. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 5,89,779 based on the invalid reference was also unjustified. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 157 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216349</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reference to the Valuation Officer was invalid as it was not preceded by the rejection of the books of account. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 5,89,779 based on the invalid reference was also unjustified. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>