<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 155 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of books of account and ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It was determined that no trading addition was necessary after considering the comparison of gross profit rates between periods, particularly noting that the gross profit rate disclosed by the assessee for the first period was better than the average of the preceding three years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 155 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of books of account and ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It was determined that no trading addition was necessary after considering the comparison of gross profit rates between periods, particularly noting that the gross profit rate disclosed by the assessee for the first period was better than the average of the preceding three years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>