<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding service tax based on billed amounts and disallowing Cenvat credit was unsustainable. As the provisional assessments were not finalized and the issue of wrongly availed credit was not raised in the notices, the demand was deemed unnecessary. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal hearing, stayed the recovery of the demand, and allowed the appellant&#039;s stay application until the appeal&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding service tax based on billed amounts and disallowing Cenvat credit was unsustainable. As the provisional assessments were not finalized and the issue of wrongly availed credit was not raised in the notices, the demand was deemed unnecessary. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal hearing, stayed the recovery of the demand, and allowed the appellant&#039;s stay application until the appeal&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>