<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the adjustment of Rs. 2,43,79,210/- under section 115JB as it was not a provision but a direct loss in stock valuation. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed a re-examination of the disallowance of Rs. 2,42,81,004/- under section 14A, emphasizing the need for a proper assessment based on judicial principles and the nature of the assets. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the adjustment of Rs. 2,43,79,210/- under section 115JB as it was not a provision but a direct loss in stock valuation. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed a re-examination of the disallowance of Rs. 2,42,81,004/- under section 14A, emphasizing the need for a proper assessment based on judicial principles and the nature of the assets. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>