<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 128 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216314</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to direct the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the penalty issue post the High Court&#039;s decision on the quantum appeal. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s authority under section 275(1A) to extend the time limit for passing penalty orders, ensuring no prejudice to the appellant. Additionally, the Court clarified that any order found barred by limitation would automatically revive without further orders, providing reassurance on the limitation issue. The judgment aimed to address concerns and ensure a fair resolution amidst pending quantum proceedings, emphasizing just and equitable outcomes in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 128 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216314</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to direct the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the penalty issue post the High Court&#039;s decision on the quantum appeal. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s authority under section 275(1A) to extend the time limit for passing penalty orders, ensuring no prejudice to the appellant. Additionally, the Court clarified that any order found barred by limitation would automatically revive without further orders, providing reassurance on the limitation issue. The judgment aimed to address concerns and ensure a fair resolution amidst pending quantum proceedings, emphasizing just and equitable outcomes in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>