<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 120 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3) for multiple cash payments to the same party on a single day, citing the non-retrospective nature of the amendment. The ground related to the disallowance of license fee payment was dismissed as not pressed, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 120 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3) for multiple cash payments to the same party on a single day, citing the non-retrospective nature of the amendment. The ground related to the disallowance of license fee payment was dismissed as not pressed, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>