<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 118 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216304</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the application of Section 50C for computing capital gains, invalidating the reference to the Department Valuation Officer under Section 55A, directing adoption of the fair market value declared by the assessee for 01.04.1981, adjusting the property valuation rate on the sale date, and restricting the exemption under Section 54 to one flat.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 118 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216304</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the application of Section 50C for computing capital gains, invalidating the reference to the Department Valuation Officer under Section 55A, directing adoption of the fair market value declared by the assessee for 01.04.1981, adjusting the property valuation rate on the sale date, and restricting the exemption under Section 54 to one flat.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>