https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216299 Interference with an acquittal in appeal is justified only where the trial court's findings are shown to be perverse or unreasonable. The trial court rejected the prosecution case on several grounds, including defects in search and seizure, non-examination of attesting witnesses, defects in sanction, delay in sanction and complaint, and the evidentiary value of the alleged voluntary statement. On the record, no perversity or unreasonableness was established, so the acquittal was not disturbed. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216299 Interference with an acquittal in appeal is justified only where the trial court's findings are shown to be perverse or unreasonable. The trial court rejected the prosecution case on several grounds, including defects in search and seizure, non-examination of attesting witnesses, defects in sanction, delay in sanction and complaint, and the evidentiary value of the alleged voluntary statement. On the record, no perversity or unreasonableness was established, so the acquittal was not disturbed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216299