https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216296 The appellant was found eligible for CENVAT Credit on invoices with incorrect service receiver addresses as the services were utilized for manufacturing activities. Despite the violation of Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, the addressing error was deemed rectifiable post-credit availment. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the actual utilization of services for manufacturing purposes. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal based on established facts and legal interpretations, concluding that the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit was valid. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216296 The appellant was found eligible for CENVAT Credit on invoices with incorrect service receiver addresses as the services were utilized for manufacturing activities. Despite the violation of Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, the addressing error was deemed rectifiable post-credit availment. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the actual utilization of services for manufacturing purposes. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal based on established facts and legal interpretations, concluding that the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit was valid. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216296