<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 109 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216294</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision upholding the setting aside of a penalty imposed on the assessee. The court found that the assessee had genuine doubts about the duty payable, had corresponded with authorities seeking clarification, and promptly paid the duty upon being informed of the liability. The court concluded that there was no intention to evade tax and no substantial question of law arose. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 109 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216294</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision upholding the setting aside of a penalty imposed on the assessee. The court found that the assessee had genuine doubts about the duty payable, had corresponded with authorities seeking clarification, and promptly paid the duty upon being informed of the liability. The court concluded that there was no intention to evade tax and no substantial question of law arose. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>