<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 100 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216284</link>
    <description>A scheme of arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was upheld where the court found it to be a bona fide commercial restructuring of telecom infrastructure and services. The Income-tax Department was entitled to object as a creditor for its subsisting revenue claim, but the objection failed on merits. The scheme was not treated as a colourable device or a sham merely because it could produce tax benefits, and the absence of monetary consideration did not invalidate it because the restructuring involved reciprocal commercial advantages. The appellate court sanctioned the scheme while preserving the revenue authorities&#039; right to recover existing or past tax liabilities in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 100 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216284</link>
      <description>A scheme of arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was upheld where the court found it to be a bona fide commercial restructuring of telecom infrastructure and services. The Income-tax Department was entitled to object as a creditor for its subsisting revenue claim, but the objection failed on merits. The scheme was not treated as a colourable device or a sham merely because it could produce tax benefits, and the absence of monetary consideration did not invalidate it because the restructuring involved reciprocal commercial advantages. The appellate court sanctioned the scheme while preserving the revenue authorities&#039; right to recover existing or past tax liabilities in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>