<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 87 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for verification. It was ruled that if the assessee did not collect any donations or capitation fees, they would be entitled to exemption under Section 11. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 87 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for verification. It was ruled that if the assessee did not collect any donations or capitation fees, they would be entitled to exemption under Section 11. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>