<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 886 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals and confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various grounds. The judgments highlighted the importance of consistency in accounting methods and compliance with legal provisions and precedents. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances, allowances of deductions, and proper assessment of income, setting aside revenue authorities&#039; orders where necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 886 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals and confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various grounds. The judgments highlighted the importance of consistency in accounting methods and compliance with legal provisions and precedents. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances, allowances of deductions, and proper assessment of income, setting aside revenue authorities&#039; orders where necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>