<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216244</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that unrealised export turnover should not be included in the total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 80HHC. The Court emphasized the distinction between export turnover and total turnover, aligning with the defined terms and relevant legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216244</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that unrealised export turnover should not be included in the total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 80HHC. The Court emphasized the distinction between export turnover and total turnover, aligning with the defined terms and relevant legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>