<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 66 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify Municipal ratable values and adopt the higher of actual rent or Municipal ratable value for computing income from house property. Deduction for interest was allowed based on the nexus between the deposit and interest income. The principles were applied to assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 66 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify Municipal ratable values and adopt the higher of actual rent or Municipal ratable value for computing income from house property. Deduction for interest was allowed based on the nexus between the deposit and interest income. The principles were applied to assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>