<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 953 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216225</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in a tax case. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that the AO&#039;s calculations were incorrect and lacked concrete evidence. It was emphasized that the rejection of books of account was unjustified as the financial performance was better than the previous year, and no specific defects were identified. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 953 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216225</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in a tax case. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that the AO&#039;s calculations were incorrect and lacked concrete evidence. It was emphasized that the rejection of books of account was unjustified as the financial performance was better than the previous year, and no specific defects were identified. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>