<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 56 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for delay in filing the appeal by 128 days, as the reasons provided were not considered justifiable. The Commissioner (Appeal) expanding the scope of exemption Notification N.52/2003-Cus. by allowing the transfer of raw materials as re-export raised a substantial question of law. The Tribunal found that the interpretation of law provided by the Revenue was insufficient to warrant condonation of the delay. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, and the appeal was not allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 56 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for delay in filing the appeal by 128 days, as the reasons provided were not considered justifiable. The Commissioner (Appeal) expanding the scope of exemption Notification N.52/2003-Cus. by allowing the transfer of raw materials as re-export raised a substantial question of law. The Tribunal found that the interpretation of law provided by the Revenue was insufficient to warrant condonation of the delay. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, and the appeal was not allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>