https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216212 The Commission directed the PIO to provide complete information to the appellant by a specified date regarding the RTI application seeking details on candidate selection and qualifications. Despite the PIO's explanations for the delay, a penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act due to the unjustified delay of over 100 days in providing the correct information. The decision emphasized the importance of timely and complete information disclosure, holding PIOs accountable and serving as a deterrent against delays in fulfilling obligations under the RTI Act. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216212 The Commission directed the PIO to provide complete information to the appellant by a specified date regarding the RTI application seeking details on candidate selection and qualifications. Despite the PIO's explanations for the delay, a penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act due to the unjustified delay of over 100 days in providing the correct information. The decision emphasized the importance of timely and complete information disclosure, holding PIOs accountable and serving as a deterrent against delays in fulfilling obligations under the RTI Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216212