<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 50 - ITAT, COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216211</link>
    <description>In block assessment, additions for alleged shortfall in agricultural income and cash credits cannot be sustained without search material linking the amounts to undisclosed income, and confirmations from creditors supported deletion. Income estimated at a fixed percentage under section 44AF was treated as covering business allowances, so no separate depreciation deduction survived. Jewellery capital introduced by partners was also accepted where the related income had been disclosed under VDIS and the disclosure was accepted by the competent authority, with no contrary search evidence. The commentary states the resulting position that search-based additions failed on the facts, while the depreciation claim was rejected against estimated income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 50 - ITAT, COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216211</link>
      <description>In block assessment, additions for alleged shortfall in agricultural income and cash credits cannot be sustained without search material linking the amounts to undisclosed income, and confirmations from creditors supported deletion. Income estimated at a fixed percentage under section 44AF was treated as covering business allowances, so no separate depreciation deduction survived. Jewellery capital introduced by partners was also accepted where the related income had been disclosed under VDIS and the disclosure was accepted by the competent authority, with no contrary search evidence. The commentary states the resulting position that search-based additions failed on the facts, while the depreciation claim was rejected against estimated income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>