<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 41 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals in a tax case involving various issues. The Tribunal remanded the loan claim for fresh verification, revised the net profit estimation to 6%, upheld the treatment of royalty income as income from other sources, and deleted the addition for the Mangalore property due to lack of details. The judgment provided partial relief to both the assessee and the revenue, reflecting a balanced resolution of the disputes raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 41 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals in a tax case involving various issues. The Tribunal remanded the loan claim for fresh verification, revised the net profit estimation to 6%, upheld the treatment of royalty income as income from other sources, and deleted the addition for the Mangalore property due to lack of details. The judgment provided partial relief to both the assessee and the revenue, reflecting a balanced resolution of the disputes raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>