<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 37 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the receipt from the surrender of tenancy rights as a capital receipt, not income. The assessee&#039;s tenancy status was recognized, and fresh evidence was accepted. The amendment to Section 55(2) was deemed inapplicable, and the compensation received was not considered capital gains. The Tax Case Appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 37 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the receipt from the surrender of tenancy rights as a capital receipt, not income. The assessee&#039;s tenancy status was recognized, and fresh evidence was accepted. The amendment to Section 55(2) was deemed inapplicable, and the compensation received was not considered capital gains. The Tax Case Appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>