https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216192 The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing new sources of income and acting beyond the scope of the original assessment. The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeals on merits, providing the parties with a fair opportunity to be heard. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes only, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order under Section 250(4). en-us Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216192 The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing new sources of income and acting beyond the scope of the original assessment. The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeals on merits, providing the parties with a fair opportunity to be heard. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes only, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order under Section 250(4). Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216192