https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216186 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case where the Revenue challenged the exemption granted under Notification Nos. 6/02 and 4/06. The assessee's use of the brand name "RAMCO" alongside their trade name "KARTHIC" on cement bags was deemed compliant with the notification conditions, supported by evidence of brand name ownership. The High Court determined it lacked jurisdiction over issues concerning excise duty rates and goods valuation, directing the Revenue to seek resolution through the Apex Court. The appeal was rejected, and the High Court Registry was instructed to facilitate the Revenue's appeal to the Apex Court. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216186 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case where the Revenue challenged the exemption granted under Notification Nos. 6/02 and 4/06. The assessee's use of the brand name "RAMCO" alongside their trade name "KARTHIC" on cement bags was deemed compliant with the notification conditions, supported by evidence of brand name ownership. The High Court determined it lacked jurisdiction over issues concerning excise duty rates and goods valuation, directing the Revenue to seek resolution through the Apex Court. The appeal was rejected, and the High Court Registry was instructed to facilitate the Revenue's appeal to the Apex Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216186