<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 23 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a clearing and forwarding agent, in a case concerning the classification of service for service tax payment. The Revenue&#039;s demand for service tax on godown rent was rejected as the Tribunal found that the godown rent was not inherently part of the appellants&#039; service. The extended period for tax demand was deemed invalid due to legal interpretations and clarifications on reimbursable expenses. The Tribunal concluded that the situation was more aligned with tax planning rather than evasion, setting aside the tax demand order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 23 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a clearing and forwarding agent, in a case concerning the classification of service for service tax payment. The Revenue&#039;s demand for service tax on godown rent was rejected as the Tribunal found that the godown rent was not inherently part of the appellants&#039; service. The extended period for tax demand was deemed invalid due to legal interpretations and clarifications on reimbursable expenses. The Tribunal concluded that the situation was more aligned with tax planning rather than evasion, setting aside the tax demand order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>