https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216177 Sanction for prosecution of Accused No. 2 was treated as duly proved, with the sanctioning authority examined and no effective challenge made to the order's authenticity or legality. The evidence then supported findings of criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, destruction of records, forgery, use of forged documents, falsification of accounts, and corruption in relation to reward funds. Departmental witnesses, documents, handwriting and fingerprint opinion, and surrounding circumstances were relied on to show manipulation of the reward process, fabrication and substitution of records, and misappropriation of the reward amount. The defence theory of multiple genuine informers was rejected, and the accused were found guilty. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216177 Sanction for prosecution of Accused No. 2 was treated as duly proved, with the sanctioning authority examined and no effective challenge made to the order's authenticity or legality. The evidence then supported findings of criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, destruction of records, forgery, use of forged documents, falsification of accounts, and corruption in relation to reward funds. Departmental witnesses, documents, handwriting and fingerprint opinion, and surrounding circumstances were relied on to show manipulation of the reward process, fabrication and substitution of records, and misappropriation of the reward amount. The defence theory of multiple genuine informers was rejected, and the accused were found guilty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216177