<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216175</link>
    <description>The court accepted the respondents&#039; statement that the circular did not prohibit authorities from considering eligibility under Section 10(10C) in accordance with the law. Authorities were directed to decide on the exemption independently of the circular and not solely rely on it. The CBDT was requested to consider issuing instructions similar to those for RBI employees, emphasizing that the circular should not bind authorities in determining exemption eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216175</link>
      <description>The court accepted the respondents&#039; statement that the circular did not prohibit authorities from considering eligibility under Section 10(10C) in accordance with the law. Authorities were directed to decide on the exemption independently of the circular and not solely rely on it. The CBDT was requested to consider issuing instructions similar to those for RBI employees, emphasizing that the circular should not bind authorities in determining exemption eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>